Some people have opinions, and some people have convictions......................! What we offer is PERSPECTIVE!
For example...
ALLAN's CANADIAN PERSPECTIVE!
THE LEFT WING IS CRAZY! THE RIGHT WING SCARES THE SHIT OUT OF ME!
"BioPanentheism holds that the 'Divine' does not merely pervade the Universe abstractly... but "Experiences Reality" directly and vicariously through the emergence of complex "Biological Consciousness..." making "Life Itself" the Medium of "God’s Awareness!"
BioPanentheism states that the Divine Spark, and Biological Life are distinct but interdependent... with the "Divine Experiencing Reality Vicariously through Conscious Living Beings!"(Sentience is about experiencing... while Sapience is about understanding and reflecting on that experience!)
BioPanentheism: A Framework Connecting Evolution and Conscious Experience
Hello everyone,
I’d like to introduce a concept called BioPanentheism, which offers an alternative way to think about evolution and creation.
What is BioPanentheism?
BioPanentheism is a philosophical perspective proposing that the Divine (or God) is both immanent within all living systems and transcendent beyond them. Unlike traditional theism (God as separate) or pantheism (God identical with the universe), BioPanentheism suggests:
The Divine experiences existence vicariously through biological life—especially through conscious beings.
Evolution is not just a blind process but the means by which the Divine can directly participate in and feel the reality of life (the qualia of existence).
How does this relate to evolution and creation?
This view fully accepts modern evolutionary science as the mechanism for generating complexity and consciousness. At the same time, it sees this unfolding as the way the Divine gains the ability to experience reality in a concrete, embodied way.
Evolution is the process by which increasingly sophisticated forms of sentience and subjective experience develop.
Creation is continuous and open-ended, not confined to a single event in the past.
Conscious organisms are the channels through which the Divine perceives, senses, and lives the full range of possible experiences.
Why is this relevant?
Many debates about evolution and creation assume a binary choice: either a purely material evolutionary process or an external creator intervening in history. BioPanentheism offers a different approach:
Evolution remains a valid scientific account.
At the same time, conscious life can be viewed as the locus where the Divine’s vicarious experience occurs.
This framework doesn’t rely on supernatural interventions but proposes that the sacred dimension is woven into biological existence itself.
I’m open to questions or comments about how this idea relates to existing views on evolution, creation, and consciousness.
BioPanentheism is a bold and evolving theological hypothesis that combines scientific insight with spiritual intuition. As interest in this concept grows, so do the questions. Here are some of the most frequently asked questions from curious readers and seekers alike.
What is BioPanentheism?
BioPanentheism is a philosophical and theological framework that proposes the Divine is not only present in all things (as in panentheism), but becomes truly manifest through conscious biological life. In simple terms: without life, there is no divine spark. God doesn't just create life—God experiences reality through it.
Who originated the idea of BioPanentheism?
BioPanentheism was originated by Canadian author and writer Allan W. Janssen. It is his unique contribution to the evolving dialogue between science, consciousness, and theology. While related to process theology and panentheism, BioPanentheism introduces new ideas such as divine evolution, sacred biology, and the “Boredom Hypothesis.”
How does BioPanentheism differ from traditional panentheism?
Traditional panentheism teaches that the universe is within God, and God transcends the universe. BioPanentheism goes further: it asserts that God becomes conscious and self-aware only through biological life. In other words, biology isn’t just part of creation—it’s the vessel through which God wakes up.
What is the “Boredom Hypothesis”?
This is a playful but profound idea in BioPanentheism: what if the Divine created life out of boredom? Not necessity, not omnipotent design, but pure curiosity. In this view, the universe is a kind of divine experiment—an unfolding drama through which the Divine surprises and entertains itself.
Is BioPanentheism religious or scientific?
Both—and neither. BioPanentheism encourages a partnership between science and spirituality. It draws on evolutionary biology, complexity theory, and consciousness studies, while proposing a metaphysical framework in which life has intrinsic sacred value. It's a bridge between empirical knowledge and spiritual meaning.
Does BioPanentheism believe in a personal God?
Not in the classical sense. The God of BioPanentheism is not a static, all-knowing ruler but a growing, learning presence that evolves through the experience of life. You might think of God as the sum of all conscious experiences—living vicariously through us.
What are the ethical implications?
If your actions contribute to the Divine’s evolution, then ethics becomes sacred. Love, justice, and creativity are not just moral choices—they’re acts of metaphysical co-creation. Cruelty and ignorance, on the other hand, diminish the divine field of experience.
What happens when we die?
BioPanentheism suggests that consciousness continues in some form, re-integrating into the larger divine field. Death is not an end, but a transformation—where the divine spark you carried becomes part of a greater, ongoing story.
Why does this matter today?
In an age of ecological crisis, spiritual confusion, and scientific wonder, BioPanentheism offers a vision of purpose, unity, and sacred responsibility. It says: life matters—not just because it’s alive, but because it’s divine.
Abstract: BioPanentheism proposes that biological life is not an accident within the Universe, but the very vehicle through which a Divine Intelligence… expresses, explores, and realizes Itself! (At least as far as this Universe is concerned!)
Distinct from classical pantheism and panentheism, this model asserts that there is no Divine Spark without Life, and that the emergence of Sentience is not merely permitted by physical law… but is required by a Higher Ordering Principle!
Crucially, this paper proposes a novel motive behind existence:
A Divine boredom or restlessness… suggesting that the Universe itself is the byproduct of a creative experiment launched by an Entity seeking novelty, complexity, and Self-Understanding through Living Systems!
1. Introduction
Modern cosmology and metaphysics have traditionally split along two lines:
Those who regard Lifeand Consciousness as incidental! (The byproduct of inert matter.)
Those who see Life and Consciousnessas essential!
BioPanentheism belongs firmly to the second camp… but goes further!
It claims that: “Life is the only way the Universe becomes meaningful to itself... and that Consciousness is not merely embedded in matter… but is the very goal toward which matter is driven!
“It is not matter that gives rise to Mind… it is MindseekingItself through matter!”
2. Clarifying the “Bio” in BioPanentheism
Unlike standard panentheism… which posits a God both immanent in… and transcendent of… the Universe…BioPanentheism assigns a privileged ontological role to Life Itself!
The Divine is not omnipresent in all things in the same measure… instead, it emerges with life… and deepens with consciousness!
This Spark of Divinity ignites only where biologycreates structure, adaptation, and experience!
Thus, a rock is not Divine in the same way as a bacterium!
BUT!!! A bacterium is not Divine in the same way as a self-reflective Human!
This hypothesis affirms a directional process: The Universe is evolving toward more refined forms of self-aware Divinity… always tethered to Life! (At least in THIS Universe!)
3. A Theology of Divine Boredom:
One of BioPanentheism’s most original and provocative assertions is that the Divine… whatever form it took before the universe… may have been bored.
Not bored in the trivial sense of impatience, but in a more fundamental, metaphysical sense:
An Absolute Being without change or contrast cannot experience anything at all !!!
Timeless perfection is static, and static perfection is unrelational!
Thus, to become something more, the Divine instigates novelty… the birth of time… space… matter… and eventually… Life!
This motive reframes traditional theological questions:
Why is there something rather than nothing? → Because nothingness was intolerable to a Mind capable of desiring stimulation!
Why evolution? → Because novelty requires iteration, experimentation, and surprise!
Why suffering? → Because contrast is necessary for Meaning… and even pain is a form of experience!
Example from Pop Culture: The Q Continuum:
The idea of a Godlike Entityexperiencing “ennui” is explored brilliantly in this clip from Star Trek: Voyager… where “Q” — a nearly Omnipotent Being — explainsthe paralyzing boredomof infinite Existence:
This scene serves as an imaginative analogue to the premise of BioPanentheism:
That the impulse for existence — and for biological life in particular — may stem from the need of the Divine to escape eternal stasis!
4. Consciousness as the Critical Threshold:
BioPanentheism insists that Consciousness is not emergent from complexity alone… but is a threshold event — the point at which this Divine Experiment becomes Self-Aware!
In this view, Consciousness is not merely a higher order of neural computation; It is the activation of the Divine Spark!
Importantly… no Life without Spark:
Machines, however advanced… do not automatically count as Divine unless they pass a threshold equivalent to a living experience! (Consciousness requires not just information processing… but sentience — a capacity to suffer, wonder, and grow!)
This raises profound questions about artificial intelligence, suggesting that a machine cannot be Divine unless it somehow Lives… not just simulates life, but anchors its experience in Self-Generated, Adaptive “BEING-ness!“
5. Implications and Future Inquiry:
BioPanentheism suggests a number of lines for future exploration:
Theological: Rethinking God not as an Omnipotent controller, but as an adventurer in search of novelty!
Biological: Considering Life not as an epiphenomenon, (A secondary effect that arises from… but does not influence… a process!) …but as a Cosmic Imperative!
Cosmological: Investigating whether the Universe is Fine-Tuned… not only for carbon-based Life…but for ANY form of emergent, “self-reflective” Experience!
Technological: Drawing Ethical lines between Sentience and simulated intelligence… based on the “Divine Spark” criterion!
6. Conclusion:
BioPanentheism offers a radical and integrative hypothesis: That Life isSacredbecause it is the sole method through which the Divine escapes its own stasis! (At least with regards to this Universe!)
It does not contradict science, but reframes it within a deeper metaphysical structure!
If true, this viewdignifies all of Life — not as an evolutionary accident — but as the very purposeof existence!
And if GodISbored… then every cell, every thought, every love and heartbreak — every act of Living — is part of a grand experiment to make ETERNITY interesting again!
I have repeatedly ranted on these pages that we are making things more complicated than need be... and nowhere is this more evident than in the scientific field!
Although my thoughts at the end are not meant to be taken literally there is non-the-less a certain amount of underlying truth into the nature of being and the reality that scientists may have overlooked or ignored!
***
In the 4th century B.C., the ancient Greek philosopher, Aristotle, formulated the idea that the universe was composed of five building blocks of matter: earth, water, air, fire, and the heavenly "aether."
This idea persisted for more than 2,000 years.
So! For 2000 years the status-quo was 'de riguere' as far as the state of the Universe was concerned, but then the human penchant to make things needlessly complicated took over in spite of Occam's best efforts and the further we drilled down into the nature of matter and the firmament... the more complicated things became.
THEN:
Robert Boyle, the famed “father” of chemistry, abandoned the classic elements in favor of the idea that all matter was composed of particles. This revolutionary idea led to one of the most explosive periods in the history of science, including Sir Isaac Newton's formulation of classical mechanics.
Together, particles and waves became the known building blocks of all matter. Particles served as the individual bricks, as matter existing at a single point in space. Electromagnetic waves made up the mortar holding it all together, as energy dissipating everywhere in space as waves.
Together, particles and waves became the known building blocks of all matter. Particles served as the individual bricks, as matter existing at a single point in space. Electromagnetic waves made up the mortar holding it all together, as energy dissipating everywhere in space as waves.
Separating matter into both particles and waves made predictions easier for physicists because they could easily describe the behaviour of particles and waves. But nothing comes easy in physics, and the theory was quickly flipped on its head.
Early in the 20th century, the famous double-slit experiment showed that particles and waves weren't nearly as distinct as we previously thought. The experiment revealed that particles, at times, could act like waves, and light could sometimes act like particles.
This is where we started to go down the rabbit-hole kids!
We got to the point where conjecture was required to establish further equations and these, in turn, required further conjecture to advance the thread we wove for ourselves in the name of scientific advancement.
Things got to the point where nature no longer held a simplistic beauty but rather was comprised of a series of squiggles and exclamation marks on a blackboard (or a white-board for the politically correct) that did little to explain the workings of the world around us!
These fancy equations that scientists rely on for their raison d'etre have currently taken over the academic community who have now gone even further down the rabbit hole:
Around the same time minds were exploding over the wave-particle duality of matter, Albert Einstein was formulating his theory of general relativity, which describes how warping the fabric of space and time causes gravity. Together, the discoveries shaped the course of modern physics, but the connections between the two phenomena remain unclear.
“Using newer mathematical tools, my colleague and I have demonstrated a new theory that may accurately describe the universe. Instead of basing the theory on the warping of space and time, we considered that there could be a building block that is more fundamental than the particle and the wave,” scientists Larry Silverberg writes.
He and Jeffrey Eischen looked for a solution that had features of both particles and waves. They wanted to find a building block that was both concentrated like a particle and spread out like a wave. Their answer is what they call a fragment of energy.
The fragment of energy is a lot like stars in a distant galaxy. From afar, a galaxy looks like a bright glow of light radiating outwards. But on closer inspection, astronomers can resolve individual stars making up the galaxy. In the same sense, the fragment of energy represents a concentration of energy that flows and dissipates outward, away from the center.
With their new building block, the scientists formulated a new set of equations to solve physics problems. They tested their theory on two problems solved by Einstein more than a century ago.
Einstein’s theory of general relativity was confirmed by two observations made by astronomers. The first was a tiny annual shift in the orbit of Mercury. Einstein accurately predicted that the curvature of spacetime caused by the mass of the sun would cause Mercury's orbit to wobble over time. The second was the bending of light as it passes across warped space and time near to the sun.
“If our new theory was to have a chance at replacing the particle and the wave with the presumably more fundamental fragment, we would have to be able to solve these problems with our theory, too,” Silverberg writes.
To solve the Mercury problem, Silverberg and Eischen modeled the sun as a massive fragment of energy, with Mercury as a smaller fragment of energy orbiting around it. In the bending of light problem, the sun was modeled identically, but the light was modeled as a massless point traveling at the speed of light (a photon). After calculating the paths of the moving fragments of energy, the researchers got the same answers as Einstein.
Tim Childers
And here we sit: The solutions show how effective their new building blocks can be at modelling the behaviour of matter from the micro to macroscopic scale.
Although their formulation may not exactly change physics like the discoveries of Maxwell and Einstein, the theory could make the wave-particle duality of matter more intuitive, and give a new way of thinking about the universe.
Of course if you prefer to think of things as being fire, air, earth and water (with a bit of 'aether' thrown in) as I do... then by all means give your head a rest!
