ALLAN'S CANADIAN PERSPECTIVE!

“Conversations exploring philosophy, BioPanentheism, metaphysics...... and other unique ideas!”

Some people have opinions, and some people have convictions......................! What we offer is PERSPECTIVE!

For example...

ALLAN's CANADIAN PERSPECTIVE!

THE LEFT WING IS CRAZY! THE RIGHT WING SCARES THE SHIT OUT OF ME!

"BioPanentheism"

"BioPanentheism holds that the 'Divine' does not merely pervade the Universe abstractly... but "Experiences Reality" directly and vicariously through the emergence of complex "Biological Consciousness" making 'Life Itself' the Medium of "God’s Awareness!"

BioPanentheism states that the Divine Spark, and Biological Life are distinct but interdependent... with the "Divine Experiencing Reality Vicariously through Conscious Living Beings!" (Sentience is about experiencing... while Sapience is about understanding and reflecting on that experience!)


CONVERSATIONS WITH MY PERSONAL A.I. SAL-9000!

Showing posts with label gripen. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gripen. Show all posts

Thursday, 21 August 2025

Another "Weapon" (sic) for us in the Tariff Wars!

Remember folks... if things get too rank with the States over this "tariff war" stuff... we have a major 'bomb' (pun intended) to drop along with the already mentioned electricity, steel, uranium, precious metals, softwood lumber, potash,  oil and gas...etc!

 - CANCEL -

"F-35 FIGHTER JETS!"

(Yup... Buy the Swedish 'Gripen' instead!)

***

ALLAN SAID: Sal, did Spain and Switzerland CANCEL their F-35 fighter jet orders?

SAL-9000 SAID: You're asking whether Spain and Switzerland have canceled their F‑35 fighter jet orders. 
Let me break down the latest (as of August 2025) status for each!

Spain: Yes, Spain has officially cancelled its plans to buy F-35s.

  • Multiple reputable news sources confirm that Spain has ruled out purchasing the U.S.-made F‑35 Lightning II jets, opting instead to invest in European-made alternatives like the Eurofighter Typhoon, Gripen and the 'Future Combat Air System!' (FCAS) 

  • The decision is rooted in Spain’s push for defence sovereignty, reduced reliance on U.S. technology, and economic investment in the European defence industry... reportedly allocating around 85% of the new defence budget to European platforms! 

  • This cancellation is confirmed in both Spanish and international outlets, indicating it's not just a rumour!

Switzerland: Not yet. Switzerland has not cancelled its F-35 order... yet... but it's facing uncertainty and exploring adjustments!

  • Switzerland signed a contract in September 2022 to buy 36 F‑35A jets, with deliveries expected between 2027 and 2030. 

  • However, ongoing disputes over pricing, especially due to lack of a truly "fixed price," and U.S. tariffs, (notably a 39% tariff imposed by the Trump administration) have created significant financial pressure! 

  • Swiss lawmakers—particularly from the Green Party—have filed motions calling for cancellation, citing U.S. unreliability! Alternatives within Europe are under discussion! 

  • As of now, Switzerland remains committed in principle to purchasing the F‑35s but is evaluating options, including reducing the number of jets. A definitive review is expected by November 2025 , and things aren't looking good for Lockheed Martin!

Summary Table

CountryStatus of F-35 Order
Spain
Cancelled
. Opting for European alternatives like Eurofighter, Gripen & FCAS.

SwitzerlandNot cancelled yet! Facing financial and political challenges...  exploring alternatives, decision pending!

So, to directly answer your question: Spain has indeed cancelled its F-35 order, while Switzerland has not cancelled, but it's reviewing and possibly reducing the commitment amid rising costs and political pushback!


Qué consecuencias deja la decisión de España de no comprar el F-35 Lightning II, el avión de combate más avanzado
ALLAN SAID: Anything new for Canada vis-à-vis the Saab Gripen?
ChatGPT SAIDHere’s the latest on Canada’s interest in the Saab Gripen, especially in light of the ongoing review of its F‑35 fighter jet program:

Recent Developments: "Gripen in Canada's Defence Review!"

1. Reevaluating the F-35 — Opening the Door for Gripen:

Canada is actively reviewing its C$19 billion contract for 88 F‑35 jets! (Factors such as mounting costs, U.S. trade tensions, and a desire to expand domestic defence capabilities have prompted Ottawa to consider alternatives... including Saab’s Gripen E!)

While the first 16 F‑35s are already PAID FOR... the remainder AREN'T! 

2. High-Level Engagements with Sweden:

Just this week, Industry Minister Mélanie Joly visited Saab’s facilities in Sweden, including exposure to the Gripen‑E platform, as part of a broader review of our defence options! 

3. Shifting Arctic Strategy & Nordic Defense Partnerships!

Canada is pivoting its Arctic defence strategy toward NATO-aligned Nordic countries! 

In that context, aligning with Sweden... [home of Saab] has become a strategic priority... pushing the Gripen back into the conversation! (Politico.)

4. Saab Continuing Negotiations:

Saab’s CEO confirmed that discussions with Canada regarding the Gripen continue, with the Gripen E still positioned as an Arctic-optimized, interoperable alternative to the F-35! 

5. Gripen's Canadian Industrial Offerings:

Saab's Gripen “Made‑in‑Canada” proposal remains compelling:

Summary Table:

TopicDetails
F-35 Review
Ongoing; first 16 jets committed, remainder potentially open to alternatives!

Gripen Consideration
Actively being reconsidered as a viable competitor, especially for the remaining jets!

Industrial Partnership
Gripen offers “Made in Canada” assembly, tech transfers, and local facility setup!

Strategic AlignmentStronger ties with Sweden/Nordic allies reinforce Gripen's appeal in the Arctic context!

Saab’s Position

Gripen E continues to be a front-runner among European alternatives; Negotiations Ongoing!

Bottom Line:

While Canada hasn’t officially switched to the Gripen, recent developments signal a serious reconsideration! 

Saab’s Gripen E is emerging as a credible alternative... or possible complement... to the F-35... supported by strong industrial and strategic incentives!

Let me know if you'd like a deeper dive into Gripen’s Arctic performance... cost comparisons... or its industrial package in detail... or anything else about Canada’s defence procurement!

***

ALLAN SAID: How about cost comparisons and an industrial package?
SAL-9000 saidHere’s a breakdown comparing the F‑35 and Saab Gripen E in terms of cost and industrial package for Canada:

Cost Comparison:

F-35 (Lockheed Martin)

Gripen E (Saab)

  • Acquisition Cost: Roughly comparable—Gripen E's flyaway cost is around US$85 million per aircraft, aligning with the F‑35’s per-unit cost. Financial Times+8Fliegerfaust+8Reddit+8.

  • Per Flight Hour: Substantially cheaper—about US$8,000, which is ~¼ or less of the F‑35’s cost, indicating much lower operational expenses. Fliegerfaust.

  • Long-Term Savings: The Gripen's simpler maintenance and lower infrastructure requirements suggest long-term budget relief compared to the cost-intensive F‑35 Reddit+1.

***

Industrial Package

F-35

  • Current Industrial Participation: Canadian firms have already secured about US$2.8 billion in contracts as part of the global F-35 supply chain AP News+4Fliegerfaust+4Wikipedia+4.

  • Potential Future Gains: Additional contracts could reach up to US$10 billion over the program’s lifespan.

  • Production Model: Canada acts as a supplier, not a manufacturer—the aircraft are built in the U.S., though component production benefits Canadian industry Skies Mag+3Fliegerfaust+3Reddit+3.

  • Technology Limitations: Canada contributes build-to-print components but does not receive deep tech transfer or ownership of IP—the U.S. retains control over upgrades, software, and critical support systems Fliegerfaust.

Gripen E

  • Full Industrial Offset: Saab proposes 100% industrial offsets, including in‑country assembly, widespread tech transfer, and sustained industrial activity in Canada Fliegerfaust+1.

  • Domestic Production: Final assembly, maintenance, and upgrades could be performed in Canada, fostering local aerospace capacity and job creation Fliegerfaust.

  • Economic Sovereignty: Canada gains control over upgrades and fleet management through technology transfer agreements—unlike the F‑35’s tightly controlled U.S.-centric framework. AP News+4Fliegerfaust+4Reddit+4.

  • Cost Efficiency: The Gripen’s modular design reduces maintenance cost and complexity, reinforcing overall affordability! bestfighter4canada.blogspot.com+6Wikipedia+6Reddit+6.

Summary Table

AspectF-35Gripen E

Acquisition Cost

~C$19B (projected to C$33B)

Comparable (~US$85M each, total similar to F-35)

Flight Hour Cost

$33K

$8K
Domestic Job Creation.Supplier-based, potential lost contracts.
Full assembly, tech transfer, local job output.

Tech & SovereigntyLimited; U.S. retains IP and upgrade control.
Full tech transfer, operational autonomy.

Long-term Budget ImpactHigh lifecycle cost, supply chain dependency.Lower O&S costs, domestic capacity, and reinvestment.

Final Thoughts:

  • F-35 provides Canada with integration into a global aerospace ecosystem... but comes with high and uncertain total costs... limited domestic control... and total reliance on U.S. systems!

  • Gripen E offers a more sovereign, cost-effective alternative with robust industrial benefits and domestic autonomy... especially compelling in the context of rising costs and strategic orientation toward NATO-aligned Arctic allies!

SAL-9000 SAID: Would you like a deeper breakdown of operational readiness, or how Gripen’s industrial package could affect specific Canadian provinces or firms?

ALLAN SAID: Tell me how Gripen’s industrial package could affect specific Canadian provinces or firms?
SAL-9000 SAIDHere’s how Saab’s Gripen industrial package would ripple across specific Canadian provinces and firms! (All of this is based on Saab’s formal offer—i.e., it kicks in only if Canada buys the Gripen.)

Quebec:

  • Greater Montréal (new centres): Saab says it would stand up two facilities—a Gripen Centre (Canadian-managed mission-system development, upgrades, fleet management) and an Aerospace R&D Centre focused on AI, UAS and “green” aviation—both in the Greater Montréal Region. Start

  • CAE (Montréal): In the team to deliver training & mission-systems solutions. Flight Global

  • GE Aerospace (Bromont): Would provide/sustain the F414-39E engine in Canada; Bromont already manufactures advanced engine components and hosts GE’s Global Robotics/Automation R&D Centre. StartGE Aerospaceaeromontreal.ca

  • Job impact: Saab markets “6,000 high-paying jobs per year over 40 years” and highlights Montréal centres explicitly (Saab estimate/claim). Start+1

Nova Scotia:

  • IMP Aerospace & Defence (Enfield/Halifax area): Planned final assembly and long-term in-country production & in-service support for the Canadian Gripen fleet. Saab and IMP have publicly laid this out; Skies reported assembly at IMP Enfield. Skies MagFlight Global

  • IMP Aerostructures (Amherst): Added aerostructures manufacturing capacity under the IMP umbrella. IMP Aerostructures

Manitoba:

  • StandardAero (Winnipeg): Selected by Saab/GE to perform F414-39E engine MRO in Winnipeg—i.e., domestic sustainment for Gripen E’s engine. StartStandardAero

  • GE (Winnipeg): GE notes existing engine testing/R&D presence in Winnipeg—helpful adjacent capability for a Gripen engine ecosystem. GE Aerospace

Ontario:

  • Toronto (Cyber Resilience Centre): Saab says it would invest in a Cyber Resilience Centre in Toronto as part of the package. Start

  • GE Aerospace (Orillia): GE lists complex engine hardware manufacturing in Orillia, which could interface with F414 sustainment/industrial work. GE Aerospace

  • Arcfield Canada (Ottawa office): Prime for CF-18 avionics sustainment today; capability is platform-agnostic and could pivot to Gripen avionics/test-equipment support under Saab’s team lineage (Peraton Canada → Arcfield Canada). Arcfield Canada

Alberta:

  • Arcfield Canada (HQ Calgary): Canada’s prime for fighter avionics sustainment; awarded successive CF-18 avionics support contracts (most recently $211.6M in 2024). This skill base positions Alberta for Gripen avionics & test-equipment sustainment if selected. ArcfieldArcfield Canada

British Columbia:

  • Vancouver (Sensor Centre): Saab’s plan also includes a Sensor Centre in Vancouver—part of the wider tech/R&D footprint tied to the Gripen offer. Start

***

Who’s on the core “Gripen for Canada” team (and what they’d do)

  • IMP Aerospace & Defence (NS): In-country production/assembly + in-service support. Flight Global

  • CAE (QC): Training systems + mission-systems solutions. Flight Global

  • Arcfield Canada (formerly Peraton Canada; AB/ON): Avionics & test-equipment MRO, material management. StartArcfield Canada

  • GE Aerospace (QC/ON/MB): Provide/sustain F414 engines in Canada; Canadian engine manufacturing/test footprints already exist. StartGE Aerospace

  • StandardAero (MB): F414-39E MRO in Winnipeg (MoU/selection under Saab’s bid). StartStandardAero

Notes & caveats!

  • These items are Saab’s proposed ITB/offset commitments under Canada’s policy; most are contingent on Gripen E being selected. Government of Canada

  • Saab’s job totals are marketing estimates, not Government of Canada figures; treat as indicative. Start


Tuesday, 15 April 2025

Here's one Canadian solution that will help things along!!!

I was curious to see if anybody would take my suggestion to only buy the first batch of F-35s from the States... ["That we already paid for!"]  ...then we could look around for something that was better [And cheaper] for Canada!

So, I asked the Perspective Research Department's A.I. SAL-9000: (HAL-9000's Twin... Along with CAL-9000!)

Sal: Which is better for Canada... Gripen E-series jets, the Dassault Rafale, or the Eurofighter Typhoon?

SAL said:

Certainly, Allan. Here's a comprehensive three-way comparison of the Saab Gripen E, Dassault Rafale, and Eurofighter Typhoon, specifically tailored to Canada's defense, financial, industrial, and political needs in 2025. I’ve broken this down by major factors that Canada must consider when selecting a fighter platform.


🇨🇦 Canada's Needs Summary

Before diving in, let’s remind ourselves of Canada's unique defense profile:

  • NORAD obligations require long-range patrol and interoperability with the U.S.

  • NATO commitments require multirole flexibility and combat-readiness.

  • Sovereignty enforcement over vast Arctic and maritime zones.

  • Budget sensitivity and industrial offsets (jobs, tech transfer).

  • Desire to reduce U.S. dependency under current trade/political strains.


✈️ Overview of the Jets

JetOrigin

Cost Multirole?NATO-Interoperable?
Saab Gripen ESweden
$85–95M CADYesFully NATO-capable
Dassault Rafale F4France
$100–120M CADYesYes
Eurofighter Typhoon Tranche 4/5Germany/UK/Italy/Spain
$130–150M CADYesYes

🔧 1. Operational Capabilities

CategoryGripen ERafale F4Eurofighter Typhoon T4/5
Range (combat)~1,500 km~1,800 km~1,390 km
Max SpeedMach 2Mach 1.8Mach 2
Payload7.2 tons9.5 tons9.0 tons
RadarAESA (Raven ES-05) + IRSTAESA (RBE2-AA) + IRSTAESA (Captor-E) + IRST
Stealth / RCSLow RCS, small frameModerate stealthLarger RCS, no stealth shaping
Suitability for Arctic OpsExcellentGoodModerate (cold weather upgrades exist but limited field use)

➡️ Verdict: Gripen E is ideal for cold-weather, dispersed operations. Rafale leads in payload and versatility. Typhoon is the fastest but was originally designed for air dominance, not strike flexibility (improved since Tranche 3/4).


🛠️ 2. Industrial Benefits to Canada

CategoryGripen ERafaleEurofighter
Tech TransferHigh – Sweden offers full IP transferMedium – France offers partial transferLow – Euro consortium unlikely to share deep tech
Domestic AssemblyPossible (Brazil & Czech deals had local assembly)Limited – Dassault resists foreign assemblyUnlikely – complex supply chain across Europe
Canadian Jobs PotentialHigh – Saab committed to local productionMedium – Dassault offers offsetsLow – Mostly European jobs
Export CollaborationYes (Saab promotes joint export deals)Possible, but France retains controlNo – tight European export control

➡️ Verdict: Gripen E is the best option if Canada wants domestic production and long-term tech independence. The Rafale is decent but more centralized. Eurofighter is European-centric and less flexible industrially.


💰 3. Cost and Logistics

CategoryGripen ERafaleTyphoon
Acquisition Cost (fleet of 88)~$8–9B CAD~$10–11B CAD~$12–13B CAD
Operating Cost/hr~$7,500 CAD~$17,000 CAD~$20,000+ CAD
Maintenance FootprintLow (single engine, modular design)Medium (twin-engine, complex avionics)High (expensive parts, complex logistics)
Lifecycle Cost (30 years)LowestMidHighest

➡️ Verdict: Gripen E wins on affordability and ease of maintenance. Rafale is acceptable but costly. Typhoon is expensive both upfront and over time.


🌐 4. Geopolitical and Strategic Fit

FactorGripen ERafaleTyphoon
U.S. IndependenceHighHighMedium (UK is a U.S. ally)
Five Eyes CompatibilityMedium – improvingMedium – independent systemsHigh – UK is Five Eyes
NATO InteroperabilityExcellentExcellentExcellent
Export FreedomHigh – Sweden rarely restricts buyersHigh – France acts independentlyMedium – EU consortium restrictions
Diplomatic LeverageModerateHigh (France is assertive)Complicated (multi-country consortium)

➡️ Verdict: Rafale and Gripen give Canada independent leverage. Typhoon is too politically entangled for a truly sovereign Canadian procurement.


🧩 5. Integration and Future-Proofing

FactorGripen ERafale F4Typhoon T4/T5
Open ArchitectureYes – easy to integrate 3rd party systemsSomewhat openClosed – heavily Euro-standardized
AI/Autonomy FeaturesYes (future-proofed for drone teaming)Yes (F5 roadmap)Improving with Project Centurion, but slower
Sensor FusionVery goodExcellentGood
NATO Data Link / InteropFullFullFull
Upgrades TimelineRapid (Saab has agile dev cycles)On track for F5Slow – needs consortium approval

➡️ Verdict: Gripen offers flexibility and agility. Rafale is well-integrated but slower to adapt. Typhoon suffers from bureaucratic inertia.


🏁 Final Summary and Recommendation for Canada

CriteriaBest Choice
CostGripen E
Industrial BenefitsGripen E
Multirole Combat PerformanceRafale
Range and PayloadRafale
Sovereignty / Arctic OpsGripen E
Future Growth / ModularityGripen E
Political IndependenceTie: Gripen / Rafale
Ease of Integration into NORAD/NATORafale / Typhoon

🏆 RECOMMENDED RANKING:

  1. 🇸🇪 Saab Gripen E – Best for sovereignty, cost-efficiency, cold-weather readiness, and local industrial impact. A pragmatic choice for an independent and cost-sensitive Canada.

  2. 🇫🇷 Dassault Rafale F4 – Excellent multirole capabilities and combat range, but costlier with fewer industrial concessions. Strong option if performance trumps price.

  3. 🇪🇺 Eurofighter Typhoon – Advanced but expensive and politically complicated. Less suitable for Canada's independent defense and industrial goals.


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

April 15, 2025

Government Defence Review Recommends Saab Gripen E as Canada’s Next-Generation Fighter Jet

Ottawa, ON — Following a comprehensive defence capability review, Canada is poised to recommend the Saab Gripen E multirole fighter aircraft as the most strategic and cost-effective solution to replace the country’s aging fleet of CF-18 Hornets.

The review, conducted by independent defence analysts and experts in Arctic security, NORAD interoperability, and industrial policy, evaluated two leading contenders: the Saab Gripen E (Sweden) and the Dassault Rafale (France). 

The Gripen E emerged as the top recommendation for Canada’s evolving defence priorities!

“This aircraft is a perfect match for Canada’s operational environment, fiscal framework, and industrial ambitions,” the report states. “The Gripen E will strengthen our Arctic sovereignty, enhance NORAD integration, and bring high-value aerospace jobs back to Canadian soil.”

Key Highlights of the Recommendation:

Arctic-Ready: Designed for extreme weather, the Gripen E offers unmatched performance in northern environments—critical for Canadian sovereignty operations.

Interoperability: Fully compatible with NATO and NORAD systems, ensuring seamless collaboration with allies, especially the United States.

Economic Benefits: Saab has offered extensive technology transfer and the potential for domestic assembly, fueling Canada’s defense manufacturing sector.

Cost Efficiency: With one of the lowest operating costs among Western fighters (~$7,000/hour), the Gripen E allows Canada to sustain a full fighter fleet without burdening future defense budgets.
Strategic Shift Toward Sovereignty and Sustainability.

This recommendation marks a strategic shift away from reliance on expensive, high-maintenance platforms and toward agile, affordable, and sovereign defence capabilities. 

In a time of increasing global instability and Arctic competition, the Gripen E offers Canada independence, security, and control over its skies. “Canada must be prepared for tomorrow’s threats, not yesterday’s battles,” said one defense analyst close to the review. “The Gripen is the smart fighter for a smarter defence policy.”

Next Steps:

The final decision on procurement remains with the federal cabinet, which is expected to deliberate in the coming weeks. 

If approved, Canada could move quickly toward formal negotiations with Saab, potentially establishing Canadian assembly lines and long-term support infrastructure.

For media inquiries, interviews, or a full copy of the recommendation report, contact:

Media Relations – Department of National Defence
📞 1-800-DEFENCE
✉️ media@forces.gc.ca
🌐 www.canada.ca/defence