Sal said: Absolutely, Allan. Let’s dig in.
π Part 1: Timeline of Key Trump Actions That Appear to Undermine U.S. Interests and/or Favour Russia
This isn’t comprehensive, but it highlights moments that collectively build a deeply troubling pattern.
π️ 2016 Campaign
-
June 2016 – Trump Jr., Manafort, and Kushner meet Russians at Trump Tower after being promised “dirt on Hillary.”
-
July 2016 – Trump publicly says: “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails…”
-
July–November 2016 – Trump’s team makes over 100 contacts with Russian individuals or officials—then lies about nearly all of them.
June 2016 – Trump Jr., Manafort, and Kushner meet Russians at Trump Tower after being promised “dirt on Hillary.”
July 2016 – Trump publicly says: “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails…”
July–November 2016 – Trump’s team makes over 100 contacts with Russian individuals or officials—then lies about nearly all of them.
π️ 2017–2019: Presidency Begins
-
January 2017 – U.S. Intelligence: Russia interfered in 2016 to help Trump. Trump calls it a “witch hunt.”
-
May 2017 – Fires FBI Director James Comey, explicitly citing the Russia investigation.
-
July 2017 – At the G20 summit, Trump had a secret, unrecorded meeting with Putin—using a Russian translator only.
-
2018–2020 – Trump routinely undermines NATO, calls EU a “foe,” and freezes military aid to Ukraine, prompting his first impeachment.
-
July 2018 (Helsinki Summit) – Publicly sides with Putin over U.S. intel, saying: “I don’t see any reason why it would be Russia.”
January 2017 – U.S. Intelligence: Russia interfered in 2016 to help Trump. Trump calls it a “witch hunt.”
May 2017 – Fires FBI Director James Comey, explicitly citing the Russia investigation.
July 2017 – At the G20 summit, Trump had a secret, unrecorded meeting with Putin—using a Russian translator only.
2018–2020 – Trump routinely undermines NATO, calls EU a “foe,” and freezes military aid to Ukraine, prompting his first impeachment.
July 2018 (Helsinki Summit) – Publicly sides with Putin over U.S. intel, saying: “I don’t see any reason why it would be Russia.”
π️ 2020–2021: Election and Aftermath
-
Mid-2020 – Intelligence warns Trump that Russia is paying bounties to kill U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan... he does nothing.
-
November 2020 – Loses election but refuses to concede, undermining democratic institutions.
-
January 6, 2021 – His supporters, fueled by the “stolen election” lie, storm the U.S. Capitol.
Mid-2020 – Intelligence warns Trump that Russia is paying bounties to kill U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan... he does nothing.
November 2020 – Loses election but refuses to concede, undermining democratic institutions.
January 6, 2021 – His supporters, fueled by the “stolen election” lie, storm the U.S. Capitol.
π️ 2022–2024: Post-Presidency
-
Ukraine War (2022) – Calls Putin “smart” and “savvy” as he invades Ukraine.
-
Ongoing – Repeats Russian talking points about NATO expansion and “Ukrainian corruption.”
-
2023–2024 – Promises “retribution,” floats ideas of becoming a dictator on “day one,” and threatens NATO allies by saying he'd “let Russia do whatever the hell they want.”
Ukraine War (2022) – Calls Putin “smart” and “savvy” as he invades Ukraine.
Ongoing – Repeats Russian talking points about NATO expansion and “Ukrainian corruption.”
2023–2024 – Promises “retribution,” floats ideas of becoming a dictator on “day one,” and threatens NATO allies by saying he'd “let Russia do whatever the hell they want.”
π§ Part 2: How an Intelligence Analyst Might Evaluate Trump as a Potential Foreign Asset or Threat
Let’s simulate how the CIA, NSA, or a Five Eyes partner might frame the risk.
π¬ Step 1: Behavioral Pattern Analysis
-
Alignment with Adversary Objectives: Repeated alignment with Russian strategic goals.
-
Inconsistency with National Interest: Undermining allies, intelligence community, democratic institutions.
-
Unexplained Secret Communications: Multiple meetings with Russian officials where notes were destroyed or never taken.
Alignment with Adversary Objectives: Repeated alignment with Russian strategic goals.
Inconsistency with National Interest: Undermining allies, intelligence community, democratic institutions.
Unexplained Secret Communications: Multiple meetings with Russian officials where notes were destroyed or never taken.
Rating: π΄ High-Risk Behavior
π Step 2: Vulnerability Assessment (MICE Framework)
Factor Definition Trump Case Money Debt, financial exposure $400M+ in debt (pre-presidency), suspicious loans, Russian funding in real estate Ideology Political/strategic leanings Authoritarian admiration, anti-NATO Coercion Blackmail, kompromat Possible sexual or financial kompromat (unproven) Ego Flattery, need for status Extreme narcissism, seduced by strongmen
Factor | Definition | Trump Case |
---|---|---|
Money | Debt, financial exposure | $400M+ in debt (pre-presidency), suspicious loans, Russian funding in real estate |
Ideology | Political/strategic leanings | Authoritarian admiration, anti-NATO |
Coercion | Blackmail, kompromat | Possible sexual or financial kompromat (unproven) |
Ego | Flattery, need for status | Extreme narcissism, seduced by strongmen |
Conclusion: Trump is vulnerable across all four vectors.
π Step 3: Intent vs. Incompetence
An analyst would consider:
-
Does he know he’s aiding Russia?
-
Or is he acting on instinct, unaware of his alignment?
Using structured analysis, this could yield three primary hypotheses:
Hypothesis | Explanation | Confidence |
---|---|---|
1. Unwitting Asset | Acts in ways helpful to Russia, not directed | π‘ Moderate |
2. Compromised Individual | Russia has leverage; he’s actively responding | π΄ High Possibility, Low Proof |
3. Rogue Actor (No Foreign Influence) | Acts purely out of ego/impulse | π‘ Moderate |
π§ Conclusion: The Intelligence Community’s Dilemma
No confirmed smoking gun, but:
-
Trump’s behaviour fits known profiles of compromised actors.
-
He meets nearly every criterion for being exploitable or manipulated.
-
His actions—deliberate or not—have undermined U.S. security, alliances, and democracy.
Absolutely, Allan. Here is a 1,200-word op-ed styled for a major publication like The Washington Post, The Atlantic, or The Guardian. It's crafted to strike a balance between urgency, credibility, and opinionated critique.
OK Sal, write up a Press Release!
Is Donald Trump a Russian Asset... or Just the Perfect One Without Knowing It?
By Allan W. Janssen
Since the earliest days of Donald Trump's candidacy, a troubling question has loomed over his behaviour, alliances, and public statements:
Is he merely reckless and narcissistic — or is something far more dangerous going on?
After reviewing his actions, one might reasonably conclude that Trump has either lost all grounding in democratic values or is somehow entangled in a scheme to sabotage the United States from within.
Either possibility is terrifying. But increasingly, the evidence suggests that Donald Trump is acting either as a Russian asset or like one... and perhaps doesn’t even realize it.
A Pattern, Not a Coincidence
Let’s begin with the pattern. Trump’s behaviour during and after his presidency reads like a strategic checklist from the Kremlin’s playbook:
-
Undermine NATO.
-
Discredit U.S. elections.
-
Elevate Putin on the world stage.
-
Sow distrust in American intelligence agencies.
-
Freeze aid to Ukraine.
-
Encourage domestic political chaos.
-
Threaten military alliances.
-
Create doubt about America’s global reliability.
This isn’t speculation or partisan hyperbole.
These are direct consequences of Trump’s own words and actions over the past nine years.
In 2018, at the now-infamous Helsinki Summit, Trump stood beside Vladimir Putin and publicly contradicted his own intelligence community, saying, “I don’t see any reason why it would be Russia.”
When intelligence reports surfaced that Russia had paid bounties to the Taliban to kill U.S. troops in Afghanistan, Trump did nothing.
When Ukraine needed military aid to defend itself from Russian aggression, Trump tried to extort its president into helping him win reelection first... leading to his first impeachment.
Even out of office, Trump continued to amplify Russian talking points. He praised Putin as “savvy” during the brutal invasion of Ukraine. He recently told NATO allies that if they didn’t pay up, he would “encourage Russia to do whatever the hell they want.”
This is not normal political rhetoric.
This is strategic destabilization.
The Intelligence Community’s Quiet Alarm
Within the world of espionage and national security, the term “asset” does not always mean a person is an official spy or a James Bond-style traitor.
Often, an unwitting asset is someone whose personality, vulnerabilities, or ideology make them manipulable... a perfect tool for advancing a foreign power’s interests.
The intelligence world uses a well-known framework called MICE to assess how individuals can be compromised:
-
Money – Trump had hundreds of millions in debt before office. Reports link his properties to suspicious Russian real estate deals and Deutsche Bank loans tied to Russian entities.
-
Ideology – He exhibits authoritarian leanings and disdain for traditional U.S. allies.
-
Coercion – The Steele Dossier may not be fully verified, but the pattern of concealment around Trump’s Russian connections is itself suspicious.
-
Ego – Perhaps Trump’s greatest vulnerability. Flattery from strongmen like Putin, ErdoΔan, and Kim Jong-un consistently produces pliant behavior.
By this framework, Donald Trump checks every box.
Trump Tower Moscow and the Web of Lies
Trump’s own former lawyer, Michael Cohen, testified that Trump was pursuing a multi-million-dollar real estate deal in Moscow while running for president... and lying about it.
Cohen later went to prison, while Trump has never been held to account for any of it.
If a high-level member of the military or intelligence community had done even half of what Trump has done... secret meetings with adversaries... denial of known intelligence.... public allegiance to foreign leaders... blatant falsehoods about national security issues... they would have been removed, investigated, and likely imprisoned.
Why is the bar so much lower for a former/current president?
The Perfect Asset — or the Perfect Storm?
Let’s entertain the possibility that Trump is not an official agent of Russia... that there’s no signed contract... no codeword messages... no drops at park benches.
That’s not how modern influence operations work.
The most effective assets don’t even know they’re being handled.
They simply act out of their own self-interest while advancing someone else’s agenda.
It’s entirely plausible that Trump is simply the perfect asset by accident: a man whose psychological makeup makes him addicted to adoration... averse to criticism... and desperate to preserve his brand and finances... all while lacking any understanding of... or interest in... constitutional democracy... or foreign policy nuance!
But whether by intent or ignorance, the results are the same: The weakening of America’s alliances, the discrediting of its democratic systems, and the emboldening of its adversaries.
What If He Is Compromised?
Then we are dealing with a crisis unlike any in American history.
Imagine a scenario where a President... influencing millions of voters... is actively compromised by a hostile foreign power.
What’s worse... there may be no smoking gun.
Just a mosaic of alarming behaviours, financial records, unexplained decisions, and decades of obfuscation.
Would the system even be capable of confronting that reality?
Or would it collapse under its own disbelief?
A Call for Clarity — and Courage
If you strip away the partisan noise and look only at the raw intelligence, the circumstantial evidence, the expert analysis, and the strategic outcomes, one question becomes unavoidable:
Is Donald Trump acting in the best interest of the United States... or someone else?
And if we can no longer confidently answer that question, then the nation must act... not with political vengeance... but with sober national defence.
Democracy does not die in darkness. It dies in broad daylight, when too many people look away, or convince themselves that the abnormal is acceptable, or that the absurd is somehow normal.
America has faced external threats before.
This time, the threat is internal... and elected.
The Constitution was written with tyrants in mind.
It’s time to remember why.
Allan W Janssen / SAL-9000
No comments:
Post a Comment