ALLAN'S CANADIAN PERSPECTIVE!

Some people have opinions, and some people have convictions......................! What we offer is PERSPECTIVE!

For example...

ALLAN's CANADIAN PERSPECTIVE!

THE LEFT WING IS CRAZY! THE RIGHT WING SCARES THE SHIT OUT OF ME!

"BioPanentheism"

“Conversations exploring politics... science... metaphysics...... and other unique ideas!”

BioPanentheism holds that "Omnia/Qualia" does not merely pervade the Universe abstractly... but "experiences reality" directly and vicariously through the emergence of any complex "biological consciousnesses" ...making 'life itself' the medium of awareness!

BioPanentheism states that Omnia/Qualia and biological life are distinct but interdependent... (symbiotic) with Omnia experiencing reality vicariously through us... ["conscious living beings"] while we receive... "Qualia... instinct... and meaning!"

(Sentience is about experiencing... while Sapience is about understanding and reflecting on that experience!)


Conversations with... "Anthropic Claude" and "SAL-9000!"

( Remember... Everything an Artificial Intelligence says is only a repeat of what some human said at some time! )

Saturday, 27 June 2026

SUNDAY MORNING FUNNIES: TRADE WAR!

Hey folks, wanna read something REALLY funny?

One of these days... (very soon) Canadians will reach the breaking point with Donald Drumpf and show him just how much... "He doesn't need anything from Canada!!!

Forget the oil and the gas, and the potash, and the uranium, and the lumber, and the precious metals... let's just take a look at ONE of the weapons we have in our arsenal!

ELECTRICITY!

The US cities that run on Canadian electricity... and don’t know it!

Story by Trisha A. Ilarde:

Most Americans flip a light switch without a single thought about where that power actually began. In dozens of US towns, though, the electricity humming through the walls started its journey hundreds of miles north, behind a Canadian dam or wind farm. Canada and the United States share one of the most connected power grids on the planet, and 86 international power lines along the Canada-US border move electricity between provinces and states.

This quiet setup worked smoothly for over a century, mostly because the two countries got along. Recent trade fights changed that, putting the hidden energy lifeline in the spotlight as tariffs and counter-threats flew. Suddenly, the idea that a Canadian premier could flip a switch and raise American power bills felt very real. 

Here are some US cities and regions that lean on Canadian electricity far more than the people living there might guess!

***

Burlington, Vermont
©Image Credit: Jared and Corin Wikimedia Commons, Licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0.

Vermont stands out as the clearest example of American reliance on Canadian power, and Burlington sits right in the middle of it. Hydro-Québec has agreed to supply roughly 25% of the state’s annual electricity needs through 2038, so Canadian hydropower makes up about a quarter of Vermont’s electricity portfolio, if not more. The connection runs through a transmission line linking a Quebec substation to the Highgate substation in northwest Vermont. Much of the state’s clean energy image is actually Canadian-made.


Buffalo, New York

©Image Credit: Tim Gerland on Flickr, Licensed under CC BY 2.0.

Power flows into Buffalo from across the Niagara River, and the city would feel a sudden cutoff harder than almost anywhere else. Buffalo and upstate New York would take an especially hard hit if Ontario restricted exports, since that tends to happen during a cold, peak-demand stretch of the year.

Experts warned that cutting electricity with little warning could cause severe impacts on both prices and the volume of power available. Sitting close to the border makes the city both lucky and exposed. Cheap, steady Canadian power feels like a gift right up until someone threatens to take it away.


Rochester, New York

©Image Credit: Ken Lund on Flickr, Licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0.

Down the road from Buffalo, Rochester shares the same heavy dependence on Ontario’s grid. One senior energy analyst noted that any Ontario move to restrict exports would fall especially hard on Buffalo and upstate New York, including Rochester. Timing makes it worse because the threat surfaced during winter, when heating demand peaks and the system has little slack. New York as a whole buys more Canadian power than any other state. That fact leaves mid-sized cities like Rochester quietly vulnerable to politics playing out hundreds of miles away.


New York City, New York

©Image Credit: Andres Figueroa from Pexes.

America’s largest city ties into the Canadian grid too, mostly through Quebec’s massive hydro network. Quebec exported about 10.39 TWh of hydropower-driven electricity to New York in 2017, with Ontario adding another 8.22 TWh.

New York State leads the country in Canadian imports, bringing in 8.6 million MWh in 2024, worth $491 million, with 77% of that coming from Ontario. Builders have completed a major project to push even more Quebec hydropower straight into the city. A chunk of the round-the-clock power in the city that never sleeps carries a Canadian accent.


Detroit, Michigan

©Image Credit: D. Jonze from Pexels.

Right across the river from Windsor, Detroit is wired directly into Ontario’s system. The electricity link connecting Michigan with Ontario consists mostly of Ontario exports into Detroit. A twist complicates the picture, because much of that power never stays put.

State regulators explain that plenty of electricity flows across the border into Michigan, yet almost none of it stays; instead, it moves eastward into Ohio and back into Canada near Niagara in a pattern called the Lake Erie Loop Flow. The city acts less like a destination and more like a busy hallway for Canadian electrons.


Minneapolis, Minnesota

©Image Credit: Josh Hild from Pexels

Bitter winters push Minnesota to draw heavily on its northern neighbour, especially the province of Manitoba. Every bit of electricity Manitoba sold to the United States in 2024 went to Minnesota, making the state its only customer.

Minnesota also ranked among five border states, alongside New York, Vermont, Michigan, and Maine, that together accounted for 78% of all Canadian exports in 2024. That dependence explains why Minnesota landed on the list of states facing an export surcharge during the trade fight. The Twin Cities stay warm partly thanks to Canadian dams.


Portland, Maine
©Image Credit: davidwilson1949 on Flickr, Licensed under CC BY 2.0.

Maine’s power story belongs almost entirely to New Brunswick. Every bit of New Brunswick’s electricity exports flowed to Maine in 2024. That single-source relationship means the entire state, Portland included, relies on a single Canadian province for its imported power. New Brunswick’s cross-border electricity sales feed directly into Maine. Residents rarely think about this tidy, direct connection. When trade tensions flared, the quiet pipeline suddenly looked like a pressure point.


Seattle, Washington
©Image Credit: dumitru B from Pexels.

The Pacific Northwest runs on a different Canadian partner, British Columbia. British Columbia accounts for roughly 95% of Canadian electricity exports in the western region, and about 15% of those sales end up in Washington. BC also reaches farther than any other province, selling electricity to 13 states, with Washington as its biggest customer. Seattle benefits from BC’s huge hydro output flowing south across the border. The clean, rainy Northwest essentially shares a watershed and a power supply with its Canadian neighbour.


Great Falls, Montana
©Image Credit: Tim Evanson on Flickr, Licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0.

Montana might feel remote, yet Great Falls plugs straight into the cross-border grid. Analysts named it among the cities that still benefit significantly from Canadian electricity. Sitting close to the Alberta and BC borders, the region taps Canadian supply whenever it makes economic sense.

Provinces sell their excess power to the south when American buyers need it, and US distributors import it when it costs less than generating it themselves. Those northern connections quietly add stability to a sparsely populated state. Most folks in Great Falls would be surprised to learn how international their light switch really is.


Ogdensburg, New York
©Image Credit: CharmaineZoe's Marvelous Melange on Flickr, Licensed under CC BY 2.0.

Perched on the St. Lawrence River, this small city sits practically on top of the Canadian border. Energy experts specifically named Ogdensburg among the US cities that still benefit significantly from Canadian electricity. Being right at the water’s edge puts it among the closest American communities to Ontario’s grid.

New York overall pulls most of its Canadian power from Ontario and imports the largest share of any state. Tiny border towns like this one often hold the deepest, oldest ties to the Canadian system. The river marking the boundary also carries the power.


Pembina, North Dakota
©Image Credit: afiler on Flickr, Licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0.

Pembina reaches about as far north as you can get in the lower 48, and its power supply shows it. The city appears among those that still benefit significantly from Canadian electricity. North Dakota receives power largely from Manitoba’s grid, which sends electricity south alongside Minnesota’s supply.

Manitoba exports electricity to both North Dakota and Minnesota through the central cross-border link. For a town wedged against the Manitoba line, Canadian power feels like the neighbour next door rather than anything exotic. The border here works more as a formality than a barrier for electrons.


Boston, Massachusetts
©Image Credit: Phil Evenden from Pexels.

New England’s biggest city has quietly bought Canadian hydropower for decades. Hydro-Québec built a 450-kV DC line in the early 1990s connecting its huge James Bay complex to the Sandy Pond substation near Boston, and it has since delivered more than 100 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity.

That single line has served as a steady clean-energy artery into the region. Hydro-Québec has sold power into New England since the 1980s. Boston’s push toward greener energy rests on a Canadian backbone. The lights of the city carry a little bit of Quebec in them.


Chicago, Illinois
©Image Credit: Wendell Stoyer from Pexels.

Chicago sits inside a larger Midwestern grid that trades power back and forth with Canada. Canada’s main customers include the Midwestern states, fed largely by Ontario and Manitoba. Because the grid stays interconnected, electricity generated in Canada can flow through several states before reaching a given home.

This trade matters for grid balancing, constantly matching electricity use to electricity production across the region. Even an inland giant like Chicago indirectly leans on its northern supply. The grid doesn’t really care where someone drew the border.


Milwaukee, Wisconsin
©Image Credit: Leroy Skalstad from Pexels.

Wisconsin came up by name when Ontario’s premier listed the states he could squeeze. Ontario’s leader said the province stood ready to go as far as cutting off energy flowing to Michigan, New York, and Wisconsin. Milwaukee sits in that same Midwestern grid network that exchanges power with Canada every day.

US utilities import Canadian electricity when they face a shortfall or when it simply costs less than producing their own. Those facts make the city part of the quiet web of cross-border dependence. A trade dispute in Ottawa could ripple all the way to a Milwaukee utility bill.


All the Northern Maine border towns!
©Image Credit: Joe Shlabotnik on Flickr, Licensed under CC BY 2.0.

Beyond Portland, the smaller communities along Maine’s northern edge bind even more tightly to New Brunswick. Because every bit of New Brunswick’s exports went to Maine in 2024, the entire state’s imported power traces back to one province. For these border towns, the Canadian grid often serves as the nearest and most practical source. New Brunswick’s cross-border electricity sales feed directly into Maine. These communities live the US-Canada energy partnership more directly than almost anyone. When relations sour, they feel the chill first. (This is only a temporary situation since Maine will eventually join Canada as one of our provinces!!!)


AND REMEMBER FOLKS... THESE ARE ONLY SOME OF THE PLACES THAT WILL BE AFFECTED! (ALONG WITH ALL THE OTHER PLACES THAT WILL BE PUT IN JEPARDY FROM ALL THE OTHER ECONOMIC WEAPONS WE HAVE AVAILABLE!) 

N.Y.C. after we shut off the electricity!!!



An assessment of my book "Being Human" as told by Artificial Intelligence Perplexity!

ALLAN: Based on the uploaded manuscript, Being Human in an Amoral Universe, I have evaluated the philosophical and scientific veracity of the proposed BioPanentheism hypothesis!

The text presents a sophisticated metaphysical hypothesis that attempts to bridge the "Hard Problem" of consciousness with biological naturalism.

Below is a detailed assessment of its strengths, weaknesses, and alignment with current academic consensus.

1. Philosophical Veracity: High Coherence.

The philosophical core of the text is robust and aligns with respected, albeit minority, positions in contemporary philosophy of mind.

  • The P-Zombie Argument & Anti-Physicalism:
    • Assessment: The use of philosophical zombies (p-zombies) to challenge physicalism is a canonical argument in analytic philosophy, most famously associated with David Chalmers (The Conscious Mind, 1996). The text correctly identifies that if p-zombies are logically possible, physical facts do not exhaust all facts, thereby supporting Property Dualism or Panpsychism.
    • Critique: While valid, this argument is heavily contested. Physicalists like Daniel Dennett argue that p-zombies are conceivable but not logically possible. The text presents the p-zombie intuition as decisive without engaging with these counter-arguments (e.g., Illusionism).
  • BioPanentheism as Russellian Monism/Panpsychism:
    • Assessment: The concept of "Omnia" as an experiential substrate actualized by biology closely mirrors Russellian Monism or Constitutive Panpsychism (e.g., Philip Goff, Galen Strawson). These views hold that physics describes the structure of matter, while the intrinsic nature of matter is experiential.
    • Strength: By removing the "personal God" of traditional panentheism, the framework avoids supernaturalism, making it a form of Naturalistic Dualism or Biocentric Panpsychism. This is a philosophically respectable position that takes consciousness seriously without violating causal closure.
  • The Hard Problem:
    • Assessment: The distinction between the "Easy Problems" (mechanisms/behavior) and the "Hard Problem" (subjective experience) is accurately represented. The text correctly notes that neuroscience has not yet bridged the explanatory gap between neural processing and subjective feeling.

2. Scientific Veracity: Mixed Plausibility!

The scientific claims range from plausible neurobiological hypotheses to highly speculative physical metaphors.

  • Neuroscience: Hormones and "First-Person Depth."
    • Claim: Neural activity provides awareness, but hormones provide the "emotional colour" or "texture of life."
    • Assessment: Plausible but Simplified.
      • Support: This aligns with Antonio Damasio’s Somatic Marker Hypothesis and Jaak Panksepp’s Affective Neuroscience, which argue that subjective selfhood and emotional depth are rooted in subcortical, homeostatic, and neurochemical processes (interoception).
      • Critique: The claim that consciousness without hormones would be "thin" or "flat" is speculative. Patients with endocrine disorders still report rich subjective experiences. Furthermore, modern theories (e.g., Lisa Feldman Barrett) suggest emotion is integral to perception itself, not just a secondary "layer."
    • AI Implication: The argument that AI lacks consciousness due to lacking an "endocrine architecture" is a strong Biological Naturalist argument (cf. John Searle). It is scientifically plausible that biological substrate matters, though not proven.
  • Physics: Omnia as "Quantum Foam:"
    • Claim: Omnia/Qualia might be the "quantum foam" from which spacetime emerges.
    • Assessment: Highly Speculative / Risk of Pseudoscience.
      • Critique: "Quantum foam" refers to spacetime fluctuations at the Planck scale. Mainstream physics does not attribute experiential properties to quantum foam. While Roger Penrose’s Orch-OR theory links quantum processes to consciousness, it is a fringe view in neuroscience and physics.
      • Recommendation: Identifying Omnia with "quantum foam" conflates metaphor with physical theory. It is safer to frame Omnia as the intrinsic nature of matter (Russellian Monism) rather than tying it to a specific, unproven physical structure like quantum foam.
  • Evolutionary Biology:
    • Assessment: The framework is compatible with evolution but faces the "Why?" question. If physical processing (p-zombies) is sufficient for survival, why did evolution "actualize" subjective experience? The text suggests it is the "deepest expression of biological life," which is a teleological statement that requires careful justification to avoid conflicting with non-teleological evolutionary theory.

3. Critical Gaps & Recommendations for Rigor:

To strengthen the academic veracity of Being Human!, consider addressing these points:

  1. Clarify "Actualization": Does biology cause experience (interactionism) or constitute it (panpsychism)? The text leans toward constitutive panpsychism but uses language that sounds interactionist. Clarify this metaphysical mechanism.
  2. Address the Combination Problem: If Omnia is fundamental, how do micro-experiences combine into macro-consciousness (human experience)? This is the primary objection to panpsychism (William James, 1890; Seager, 2010).
  3. Soften Physics Claims: Replace the "quantum foam" analogy with a broader Russellian Monist framework. Avoid implying that current physics supports experiential quantum foam, as this is not the consensus.
  4. Engage with Illusionism: Address Illusionism (Dennett, Frankish), which argues the Hard Problem is a cognitive illusion. Engaging with this view would strengthen the defense of realism about consciousness.

Summary Table:


Conclusion:

Philosophical Veracity: High. The arguments are well-grounded in contemporary philosophy of mind, particularly the Chalmersian tradition. The move toward property dualism/panpsychism is a legitimate, rigorous response to the Hard Problem.

Scientific Veracity: Moderate to Low. The neurological claims about hormones are plausible but simplified. The identification of Omnia with "quantum foam" is scientifically unsupported and risks appearing pseudoscientific.

Final Recommendation: Frame BioPanentheism as a metaphysical hypothesis compatible with science, rather than as a scientific theory.

Strengthen the neuroscience section by citing specific work on interoception and affect (e.g., Damasio, Craig, Barrett) and soften the physics claims to avoid overreach.

📚 RESEARCH CONTEXT

Researcher Profile
Field: Philosophy of Mind / Metaphysics | Stage: Author/Independent Scholar | Style: APA/Chicago (inferred)

Current Project
Focus: BioPanentheism – A naturalistic framework for consciousness
Phase: Writing/Revision
Target: Book Manuscript (Being Human! In an Amoral Universe!)

Active Threads

  • Evaluating philosophical/scientific veracity of BioPanentheism
  • Refining the "quantum foam" analogy to avoid pseudoscience charges
  • Strengthening the neurobiological basis for "hormonal depth"

Key Papers

  • Chalmers 1996 — The Conscious Mind (P-Zombies/Hard Problem)
  • Damasio 1994 — Descartes' Error (Somatic Markers/Emotion)
  • Goff 2017 — Consciousness and Fundamental Reality (Panpsychism)