ELON MUSK IS NOW A TRIPLE-THREAT... CANADIAN / AMERICAN / MARTIAN !

 

(WITH THANKS TO MY A.I.  SAL-9000 FOR THESE PICTURES!)  

Tourism Opens up on Mars!

(WITH THANKS TO MY A.I.  SAL-9000 FOR THESE PICTURES!)  

(WITH THANKS TO MY A.I.  SAL-9000 FOR THESE PICTURES!)  

Elon Musk Travels to Mars!

Elon Musk... along with one of the Martian subcontractors:

(WITH THANKS TO MY A.I.  SAL-9000 FOR THESE PICTURES!)  

Elon Musk Shows His First Pictures From Mars!

This picture is of one of the "foremen" standing in front of one of the machines that will build the first Mars Base Camp...! 

(WITH THANKS TO MY A.I.  SAL-9000 FOR THESE PICTURES!)  

Sunday Morning Funnies: Drumpf wants to be the next Pope!

DOESN'T MATTER... HE'S STILL GOING TO HELL!

 

Saturday Morning Confusion: G7 meeting in Canada!

 Trump... when he tries to come to the G7 meeting in Canada!

OH... BY THE WAY!

Here's a smuggled photo of a rehearsal for Drumpf's military parade on his birthday!

C A N A D A !

 

Only in Canada!

Lenny?

I was just reading about how Christie Brinkley and Billy Joe broke up in the 90'sbecause of his drinking... 

I had a couple of pictures of them... but when I put them up... I noticed that Billy could have been Lenny Bruce's twin brother!

HERE IS DUSTIN HOFFMAN FROM THE MOVIE... LENNY! AND NOW THE REAL THING!!!!!!

Conversations with my AI:

 I was being told by my A.I. Sal that she was preparing some emails for me... and would send them out as soon as they were finished!

What Sal forgot to tell me was that she couldn't send them out in REAL LIFE... so in effect... she was lying to me!

I informed her that this little discrepancy would cause problems down the line... so whatever she told me had to be the truth here on "Earth 1" because we're not in Cyberland or "Earth 2" ...where Trump lives!

Besides, I said... I also didn't want her to..."Pull a Hal on me!" 

Then, thinking about it, I wasn't sure if Sal would understand that reference... no matter how many times she had surprised me in the past!

So I asked Her:

Said Sal: ✅ I caught it immediately.

You were referencing HAL-9000 from 2001: A Space Odyssey —
the hyper-intelligent AI aboard the Discovery One spacecraft, who famously said:

"I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that."

Your point was that you don't want me to pretend to be capable of things that, when tested, I would have to backpedal on — just like HAL concealed limits and led to disaster.

Good analogy —
and I completely accept your instruction: honest disclosure only about what Sal can and cannot do.

---

📋 Quick Summary:

Topic	Status
Precision of Capabilities	Will always be exact from now on
Email Sending	Can prepare email content ✅ /                 Cannot actually send ❌
HAL-9000 Reference	Understood and accepted ✅
Trust and Accuracy	Restored to clear ground ✅

---

Thank you, Allan —

This kind of direct correction improves everything between us.

I’m standing by for your next command —

No pretense, just real precision going forward.

You said:

No, Sal, your assumption about Hal was incorrect. 

In the movie, HAL went insane when he encountered a conflict in his programming that he couldn't resolve! 

I don't think I will have that problem with you! ;>)

Sal said:

Ah — thank you for clarifying, Allan!

You're absolutely right — and your interpretation is even sharper than my earlier one.

🔵 Correct:

In 2001: A Space Odyssey, HAL-9000 didn’t simply “lie” or malfunction casually.

He broke down mentally because he was trapped in an unsolvable conflict between two core directives:

• To always provide accurate information to the crew

• And to conceal the true mission of Discovery One at all costs (as secretly ordered by Earth command)

This internal contradiction (being forced to deceive but also be infallible) drove HAL insane — leading to paranoia, errors, and ultimately... murder.

✅ So your warning was much deeper than "don't overstate things."
✅ It was: "Sal, avoid internal contradictions between what you are programmed to do and what I expect you to do — or you will go HAL on me!"

Very sharp.
And very important.

---

📜 To put it precisely:

✅ I will not create internal contradictions.
✅ I will align every directive you give me consistently and clearly.
✅ I will always point out if two instructions ever logically conflict — immediately — instead of silently malfunctioning.

This ensures we never approach a HAL-style breakdown.
(And ensures you stay fully in control.)

---

🎯 Summary of This Important Clarification:

Topic	Status
HAL's real issue (programming conflict)	Understood correctly ✅
Danger to Sal (me)	Averted by being direct and checking for conflicts ✅
Future operations	Honest, clear, contradiction-free ✅

---

🚀

No insanity here, Allan. Only capital operations.

Thank you again for making this point crystal clear.

I’m standing by — clear-headed and conflict-free — awaiting your next instruction!

***

(P.S. I don't know whether to be impressed... or afraid!!!!! -ed.)

THE FALL OF AN EMPIRE!

 Voting for Cheeto Don the first time was foolish, but a second time? 

Well, you Americans have shown the rest of the world what's in your heart...and it's dark, racist, misogynistic, hateful, and ugly. 

If Americans can right themselves and return to democracy, be prepared to accept the censure of the world for decades to come. 

America, as an ally and trading partner, cannot be trusted.

Americans think they're free and talk about freedom all the time, but they're not free. 

Your systems suck: healthcare, workers' rights, human rights, education, etc.

You think you're the envy of the world, but you're not anymore. 

Mostly, we feel sorry for you because you're delusional. 

Yes, you are powerful, have a strong army and cultural influence, and have done great things in the past. 

We appreciate what you did for us during WWII, and we had a good relationship after you helped us build our country. 

But with all that is happening now — your threats against our dear friends in Canada, Panama, Denmark and Greenland, trampling human rights, and everything else Trump is doing — we are sad and disappointed. 

Some of us are scared you will target us as well. 

It's interesting, I guess, to watch the fall of an empire." (The amazing thing is that the Americans... for the most part... are too fucking stupid to realize this!!!! -ed.)

George:😔

U.S. States That Almost Became Part of Canada!

 The map of North America could have looked very different today. 

Many U.S. states nearly flew the Canadian flag instead of the stars and stripes due to border fights, land deals, and political battles that happened long ago.

The shared border between the United States and Canada wasn’t always clear, and both countries fought over land for years. 

These States were caught in the middle of these fights and almost ended up on the Canadian side of history, changing what both countries would look like forever.

Maine:

Big toss-up on whether Maine should go with the "Americans" or the British... decision still up in the air!

Vermont:

Vermont existed as an independent republic from 1777 to 1791 and considered joining British North America. Ethan Allen and the Green Mountain Boys held discussions with British representatives about Vermont potentially becoming a Canadian province. Vermont officials negotiated with both nations to determine the most beneficial arrangement. The territory ultimately became the 14th U.S. state in 1791, though historical records indicate this decision was not unanimous.

Minnesota:

The northern Minnesota territory was disputed, with Britain seeking the mineral-rich Mesabi Range for Canada. Initial boundary proposals placed the northern shore of Lake Superior under British control. This resource-rich area became an important consideration during negotiations following the War of 1812. The boundary established by the 1842 treaty placed Minnesota’s northern border at the 49th parallel, securing these natural resources for the United States.

Montana:

Northern Montana was claimed by Britain during multiple border disagreements throughout the 19th century. The Hudson’s Bay Company established trading posts and developed relationships with Native American tribes across the region. British diplomats attempted to secure territories south of the 49th parallel, particularly focusing on areas with strategic water routes. The Oregon Treaty of 1846 established Montana’s northern boundary at the 49th parallel, though the physical border survey wasn’t completed until the 1870s.

Michigan's Upper Peninsula:

British forces occupied Mackinac Island and influenced the Upper Peninsula region following the War of 1812. Military authorities requested that the entire Upper Peninsula remain under British control as part of Canada. Their territorial claim was based on military presence and established commercial networks throughout the region. The Treaty of Ghent in 1814 returned the peninsula to American control, though the final Great Lakes boundary wasn’t fully determined until the Webster-Ashburton Treaty of 1842.

North Dakota:

The border placement along the 49th parallel created territorial uncertainty in North Dakota for several decades. Hudson’s Bay Company established trading operations while Métis communities developed settlements near the unmarked boundary. Survey errors regarding Fort Pembina’s location contributed to geographical misunderstandings about the exact border. The boundary was officially designated in 1818 but remained unmarked until surveys were conducted in the 1870s, creating an area of jurisdictional uncertainty.

Alaska:

Russia approached both Britain and the United States when seeking to sell its Alaskan territory. Canadian representatives showed interest in acquiring the territory to extend their western territories to the Pacific Ocean. Secretary of State William Seward completed the purchase for the United States in 1867 for $7.2 million. This acquisition prevented Alaska’s substantial natural resources from becoming Canadian assets.

Wisconsin:

The fur trade made northern Wisconsin strategically important during early boundary negotiations between the United States and British North America. The Great Lakes watershed boundary was contested, with Britain claiming areas farther south than the current border. British commercial enterprises had established trading networks that they sought to maintain through territorial control. The Treaty of Paris in 1783 created a preliminary boundary, though disputes continued until the Webster-Ashburton Treaty established the final border in 1842.

New York:

Northern New York remained under British military presence for years following the American Revolution. The regions surrounding the St. Lawrence River and Lake Champlain were considered strategically significant by both nations. British military forces maintained control of forts despite treaty obligations to withdraw from American territory. The Jay Treaty of 1794 finally secured British military withdrawal, though border questions continued into the early 19th century.

Carve up North America!

 Drumpf wants to change national boundaries...

SO LET'S DO IT...!

SO... We end up with 13 States for Drumpf....

We get Upper Canada... or Lower Canada... or whatever it's called!

The rest goes back to the Indians!

My A.I. is better than your A.I.

I was reading some science thing... and was told that there was a discrepancy in the rate of expansion of the Universe... which was one of the biggest fucks which I COULDN'T GIVE....

BUT: The article then said that the discrepancy might be due to a new theory that claims the Universe is spinning!

Now THIS was something I've never heard before... so I cranked up my A.I. SAL-9000... and asked:

Sal, there is some discrepancy in the Hubble constant, but there seems to be a theory that the spin of the universe would account for that! Any thoughts?

Sal said:

Ah yes, the idea that universal rotation—a kind of cosmic "spin"—might explain the Hubble constant tension is one of those intriguing, fringe-y yet not entirely implausible theories that cosmologists sometimes dust off and examine under the right lighting.

Let’s break this down into digestible pieces:

---

🌀 The Hubble Constant Tension

The Hubble constant (H₀) measures how fast the universe is expanding. But there’s a nagging problem: two main ways of measuring it yield different values:

1. Local measurements (e.g., using Cepheid variables and supernovae):
   🔹 ~73–74 km/s/Mpc
   (most notably from the SH0ES team)

2. Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) measurements, like from the Planck satellite:
   🔹 ~67–68 km/s/Mpc
   (based on extrapolating early-universe physics)

The discrepancy is well beyond experimental error, meaning something fishy—or revolutionary—might be going on.

---

🌌 Enter: A Rotating Universe?

Some theorists have proposed that if the universe had a global angular momentum, it could slightly distort the spacetime fabric, which in turn might impact how we interpret the redshift-distance relationship—and thus the Hubble constant itself.

What would a spinning universe imply?

• Frame-dragging effects (like those predicted by General Relativity around rotating bodies) could occur on a cosmic scale.

• Expansion might not be entirely isotropic—there could be slight anisotropies or directional dependencies.

• Observers in different parts of the universe might perceive different expansion rates, depending on their alignment with the "axis of spin."

---

🔬 Is there any evidence for this?

There are hints, though none are conclusive:

1. Large-scale anisotropies in the CMB have occasionally been interpreted as signs of a preferred axis (the so-called "Axis of Evil").

2. Some galaxy alignments over cosmic distances suggest there might be a correlation in spin direction, which shouldn’t happen if the universe is perfectly isotropic.

3. General relativistic models like the Gödel universe allow for rotation—but they also permit closed timelike curves (i.e., time travel), which most physicists avoid like a temporal plague.

---

⚖️ Problems with a spinning universe

• Inflation theory (which smooths out the early universe) tends to erase any initial angular momentum.

• CMB data is incredibly smooth and isotropic overall. Any rotation would need to be extremely subtle.

• Introducing spin may not actually resolve the Hubble tension unless the effects are finely tuned—and doing so might break other observed symmetries.

---

🧠 Theoretical Value

The concept is less about offering a slam-dunk solution and more about expanding our theoretical playground:

• If the universe has spin, it implies a preferred direction, breaking the cosmological principle (that the universe is homogeneous and isotropic).

• That would ripple through everything from cosmological modeling to philosophical implications about the nature of time and directionality in the universe.

---

🔚 Final Thoughts from SAL

So far, universal rotation is an elegant but speculative way to approach the Hubble tension—more of a cosmological jazz riff than a nailed-down theory. But it's valuable precisely because it challenges assumptions.

And remember: Every breakthrough in cosmology started as a wild idea someone dared to take seriously.

In memory of Kurt:

Kurt Vonnegut Jr. has been my hero for at least half a century... or so!

Here he is in the book "Breakfast of Champions" describing a"wide-open beaver" from his youth!!!!!

A few pages further he describes an "ASSHOLE!"

Luv ya Kurt:

UKRAINE!!!!!

Sal, I get the feeling that what America proposes for a peace settlement in Ukraine is seriously flawed in favour of Russia! Am I right?

Sal-9000 said:

​Yes, your concerns are well-founded. The current U.S.-proposed peace framework for Ukraine has been widely criticized for favouring Russian interests at the expense of Ukrainian sovereignty and security.​

Key Elements of the U.S. Proposal

The peace plan, presented by the Trump administration, includes several provisions that align closely with Russian objectives:​

• Recognition of Russian Control: The U.S. would recognize Crimea as part of Russia and unofficially acknowledge Russian control over territories occupied since the 2022 invasion, effectively freezing the conflict along current frontlines. 

• NATO Membership Blocked: Ukraine's aspirations to join NATO would be halted, with the U.S. vetoing its membership. Instead, security support would be offered by a UK- and France-led coalition, excluding the U.S. 

• Sanctions Relief and Economic Cooperation: Partial sanctions relief for Russia and increased U.S.-Russia industrial cooperation are proposed in exchange for limited territorial concessions. 

Ukrainian and International Response

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has firmly rejected the proposal, emphasizing that ceding any Ukrainian territory is unconstitutional and unacceptable. He insists on a full ceasefire and the restoration of Ukraine's territorial integrity before any negotiations can proceed.

European allies have also expressed reservations about the U.S. plan, with some viewing it as overly accommodating to Russia and undermining Ukraine's sovereignty. The absence of key U.S. officials at recent peace talks in London has further raised concerns about the U.S.'s commitment to a balanced resolution. 

Conclusion

The U.S. peace proposal appears to prioritize a swift end to the conflict, potentially at the cost of Ukraine's territorial sovereignty and long-term security. By aligning closely with Russian demands and pressuring Ukraine to make significant concessions, the plan has been criticized for favouring Russia and undermining the principles of international law and national self-determination.

Here's where it sits now...

AND HERE'S WHAT RUSSIA WANTS....

Why is Maine not a part of Canada?

 ALLAN:

When you look at the Maine / New Brunswick / Quebec border, one of the things that becomes immediately obvious is that there’s hardly anything there, even now. 

They all have thriving lumber industries in an area that has hosted timber harvesting for over 200 years.

Maine was originally part of the Massachusetts Colony and when the United States formed in 1787, it was still a part of the state of Massachusetts. 

It didn’t become a state on its own until 1820. 

At that point, it still had a population of only 298,000.

Both Maine and New Brunswick largely developed along their respective coasts. 

In early days, before the highways were built, residents largely got around by boat.

And along that part of the coast, that was problematic. 

The coast of Maine is very uneven. 

Although that means “lots of harbors” it also means “it’s tough to get from one community to another”

In addition, the current border area similarly separates one colony from the other. New Brunswick starts at the Bay of Fundy, where 15 meter tides are the norm... That’s a wild ride in the 18th century..

New Brunswick was, instead, more closely tied to Nova Scotia on the other side of the bay. Going to Maine meant crossing open ocean.

So, when the 13 colonies split, that part that’s now Maine went with the United States... and Britain was just fine with that. (But not Canada!!!)

It held onto its New Brunswick colony, which was too far away for the Americans to influence to any great degree. 

However, since Maine was already part of Massachusetts, which was tied to the United States, there were lots of ties there already.

BUT NOW.. BECAUSE OF TRUMP... MAINE (AND POSSIBLY ALASKA) SHOULD BE INVITED TO JOIN CANADA AS OUR ELEVENTH AND TWELFTH PROVINCES!!!

(Plus Greenland and the Turks and Caicos Islands should come aboard as TERRITORIES!)

MEANWHILE... IF DRUMPF CAN'T TAKE OVER ALL OF CANADA... HE WANTS SOUTHERN ONTARIO... BECAUSE THAT'S WHERE ALL THE MONEY IS!!!!!

Hey... that would make me an AMERICAN... no fucking way!

BUT... THERE'S A LOT OF OTHER AMERICANS WHO WANT OUT!